An important new campaign, Every Disabled Child Matters, was launched by four organisations – Contact a Family, Council for Disabled Children, Mencap and the Special Educational Consortium – at a well attended fringe meeting during the Labour party’s autumn conference. The need for such a campaign is long overdue, reflecting failings in the provision of services for disabled children identified in a report published by the Audit Commission in 2003:
We found a lottery of provision. The services that disabled children, young people and their families are offered depend largely on where they live, and on how hard parents are able to push. Whether or not families have access to essential provision, such as short breaks, childcare and after-school clubs is often decided by what has been provided in the past, and on the particular diagnoses families present with. Practitioners struggle to turn innovative projects into long-term secure provision.
Every Child Matters in practice
In a sense, the changes in practice and provision linked to the implementation of the national Every Child Matters (ECM) policy should be addressing these concerns, and many others highlighted by the Audit Commission. However, the main thrust of ECM to date appears to have focused on improving ‘universal’ rather then ‘targeted’ children’s services, although the inspection of these services does take into account the need to improve outcomes for children and young people with learning difficulties and/or disabilities. The difficulty here, is that inspection alone, may identify all too familiar problems, but does not necessarily bring about improvement.
Similarly, ECM has highlighted the importance of developing new, and more collaborative ways of working, and ways of doing this, for example in relation to transforming the role of the SENCO, have been reflected upon in detail (Cheminais, 2005a, 2005b). These imaginative and positive approaches to new patterns of collaborative practice need, though, to be reflected upon in the context of an ECM policy that has, to date, failed to recognise shortfalls in provision (targeted services) and the need to increase levels of funding. The effect of this failure has been twofold. First, as the Every Disabled Child Matters campaign highlights:
There is significant research and policy evidence to show that disabled children and their families experience multiple disadvantages compared to other children and their families. For example, disabled children are 13 times more likely to be excluded from school than other children.
In other words, despite the implementation of ECM the phenomenon of multiple disadvantage continues to impact on disabled children, young people and their families. Second, many professionals, including SENCOs and colleagues they work with across a range of services, although they are committed to the aims of ECM, work under great constraints making the policy aspirational rather than real.
What next?
The Every Disabled Child Matters campaign has outlined the following objectives for its work over the next three years. It wants:
To meet these objectives Every Disabled Child Matters is seeking action at government level to ensure that:
Finally, the campaign identifies what it thinks has to be done if its objectives are to be met and if its recommended actions are to be fulfilled. It argues that we need:
Next steps
Speaking at the launch of Every Disabled Child Matters, Ed Balls (economic secretary at the Treasury and close ally of Gordon Brown) gave his support to the campaign’s objectives and highlighted three key issues for families with disabled children: a shortage of respite and short break services, a lack of service coordination and the need for early intervention. He also stated that transition to adulthood for disabled children was ‘a hugely neglected part of the policy debate’. A first step in moving the campaign forward will be the bringing forward of a private member’s bill by Every Disabled Child Matters to create a minimum entitlement to short breaks for families with disabled children. This will be based on the bill introduced by Ed Balls in the last parliamentary session.
The campaign appears to well planned, and has avoided the ‘trap’ of advocating only the provision of mainstream – as opposed to specialist – services for disabled children and their families. Instead, it is arguing for disabled children and their families to be fully included in society, and in shaping the way that services are planned, commissioned and delivered. It is also arguing for an education system that meets the needs of each child and enables them to reach their full potential.
Notes
1. Audit Commission (2003) Services for Disabled Children: A Review of Services for Disabled Children is available at www.audit-commission.gov.uk/disabledchildren/
2. Ofsted (2005) Inspection of Children’s Services: Key Judgements and Illustrative Evidence. This publication does outline ways in which Ofsted inspects and makes judgements in relation to the quality of provision for children and young people with learning difficulties and/or disabilities. For example, in relation to the ECM outcome Enjoy and Achieve, inspectors are required to make judgements about how children and young people with learning difficulties are helped to enjoy and achieve.
References
Cheminais, R (2005a) ‘Every Child Matters: A New Role for SENCOs in Transforming Learning Communities’, SENCO Update, 67 (July-August), 6-7.
Cheminais, R (2005b) Every Child Matters – A New Role for SENCOs: A Practical Guide. London David Fulton Publishers.
Comments
Post new comment