Pirates, munchkins and football; can you think of interactive ideas to make your lessons more creative? David Morley explains how themes like this can allow you to plan and take ownership of your curriculum, particularly with themed creative events
| RECOMMENDED RESOURCE: For a step-by-step, chapter-by-chapter guide to developing your school’s curriculum, see The Creative Primary Curriculum. |
Where did it all go wrong?
Long ago teachers needed a separate room in their house to store the National Curriculum in its 10 individual files. ‘Hurrah!’ we all said as this was scaled down into a single spiral-bound document. Teachers set about their planning excited by the bloodlust of the Aztecs when they were hit with a bolt from the blue: the Numeracy and Literacy Strategies.
‘Use the unit plans,’ we were told, ‘but make sure you adapt them… blah, blah, blah… ’ Teachers became slaves to pages and pages of lesson plans, while at the same time becoming terrified about doing the wrong thing. ‘We need to do this because this is what Ofsted want.’
The final nail in the coffin of creativity was the QCA schemes of work. For the first time we had a guide to tell us exactly what to do and when to do it. There was no chance of anyone getting it wrong now. By following the unit plans and the schemes of work we almost had a day-by-day, hour-by-hour guide to what to teach. A bit of photocopying here and an acetate there and away we went; teaching on autopilot. By following the QCA schemes, countless schools fell into the trap of thinking they were doing the right thing. How could anyone possibly criticise a school for doing what was expected?
The QCA would say that the schemes of work were never meant to be regurgitated word for word. But to some extent that is what happened. That is why 20,000 ICT suites across the country are adorned with copies of Mondrian’s work and the word Chembakolli slips off the tongues of English youngsters so easily.
The big change
Excellence and Enjoyment was a breath of fresh air when it was published in 2003. Schools were encouraged to ‘take ownership of the curriculum’ and be ‘creative and innovative in how they teach’. While some schools reacted rapidly to this announcement, some schools did not react at all. In fact some schools did nothing and carried on doing exactly what they had been doing for a long time. And what sort of schools were these? The most successful ones! The schools which have consistently performed well with good or outstanding Ofsted inspections because they have had creativity embedded into their curriculum for a long time. Schools which start the ‘revision diet’ in September are unlikely to ever end up with their desired outcome. Until they make a leap of faith and start tackling their curriculum creatively, they will continue to churn out children starved of spark and imagination.
Breaking free
Many schools are in the position where they are still teaching from the QCA documents. Although it used to be almost acceptable to photocopy planning year after year, everyone now has access to electronic records of planning. Teaching to someone else’s plans for eternity is soul destroying. Ownership of planning needs to be seized. However, you may find in your school that a major upheaval of medium-term planning is too much for your staff to bear, especially as many of them are still just getting to grips with the new frameworks for literacy and numeracy.
One of the most effective ways of introducing a major change within a school is to aim to gain everyone’s confidence. As a leader, you will not only know who are your best teachers, but also which teachers are well respected by other members of staff and are adaptable and enthusiastic about change. If you are able to identify these people, then you have a starting point for the creative curriculum.
What should you be aiming for?
‘Bums on seats’ is not a problem for schools. We have a captive audience. But what we need to ensure is that these children are excited about their learning, feel involved in the process and have a level of anticipation about what will happen next. A creative curriculum is not simply about making links between subjects, although this is an important part of it. It is about finding ways to inspire the children by drawing in skills from art, music, technology, dance and drama. Creativity is about inspiring through the establishment of memorable learning experiences. Creativity can be a platform for establishment of personalised learning, enabling children to think for themselves, branching out into areas of curiosity and interest.
Starting point
Unfortunately, devising a creative curriculum does have a cost implication. It may be too much of a risk to change the whole school at the same time. Start with teachers you have identified as being the most suitable – perhaps one in each key stage or, in the case of parallel classes, the same year group.
They will need non-contact time to sit down with their existing planning and aim to build on it. Starting with a blank piece of paper is unfeasible as it would simply take too long. A Formula One team doesn’t throw away all their notes, plans and parts from the previous season – they build on their successes and transform their failures.
They need to take time to be very familiar with the planning before they make changes to it – it would be ideal if the teachers already had experience of working with that planning before they get their teeth into it. A low-tech approach to this can really work. They should use a large sheet of paper to plot an overview of the year ahead. But remember the focus is on the learning and objectives rather than the tasks themselves. The school may have always studied 1960s Britain in history but if teachers are more comfortable covering the 1970s – and as long as you can match the objectives – change it! Your teachers are the ones who are covering it. If you are serious about changing the curriculum, your teachers need to have the confidence to make the changes without having the need to come and check with you every five minutes! It would be worthwhile excusing the team that is experimenting with a creative curriculum from taking part in training days. They may also need additional time for planning and you may wish to offer them the opportunity to do this off site, where they are away from the interruptions of a normal school day.
Building in challenges
Although devising a creative curriculum is a challenge in itself. Set your team a challenge. Can they include over the school year:
Themed days
Initially you may want to do these as whole-school one-off events. The topics you choose are entirely flexible but the focus needs to bring out creativity and imagination. Some examples might include:
Topic days
Over time your staff will become confident enough to want to organise themed events within their own class that are suited to specific areas of the children’s learning. For example when Year 2 children study the seaside, it is not always feasible for most children in the Midlands to spend the day at the beach. In my school the beach comes to the children! All the children come to school in sunglasses wearing suitable beachwear and all of their learning is based around the sea, rounding off with a professional Punch and Judy show.
Encourage your staff to be flexible with their timetable. Slavishly sticking to 45 minutes of design technology every other Tuesday is not going to help you build your Roman homes in time. Why not plan, design and build a whole DT project in two days? Speak to your local secondary school; could they arrange for a couple of their A-level students to come and help?
It is perfectly possible to combine what you do in themed and topic days with objectives from across the curriculum that you are due to cover anyway if you are creative and imaginative. If every once in a while you dare to think and even wander out of the box for a short time, then the sky really is the limit.
David Morley is the deputy headteacher of a large primary school in Milton Keynes
Comments
Very inspiring article with
Very inspiring article with great ideas. But as I read this at 11.00pm when I am still working I wonder whether it just means more work!
Teaching Profession
This approach is very beneficial to all the children. They love dressing up and getting involved in the learning more. This job requires ENTHUSIASM AND COMMITMENT to the children and if this approach is the way to do this job well then I am all for it! If your not keen, consider a career change! Learning objectives are covered properly, if you plan properly!! :) :)
Boohoooo!! I feel sorry for
Boohoooo!!
I feel sorry for the students in your class. It is proved that children learn through imaginative experiences not through the old victorian style of teaching!!
Please prove me wrong but I don't like this
I am a primary school teacher, but I do not like the idea of this artifically creative curriculum at all.
There are so many objectives to be covered in school, and so many long working hours, do we really want to be spending extra time thinking up how we can artifically make each day and lesson more memorable, by dressing up as pirates and making everything pirate related? To me it sounds like a -total gimmick-
I would also strongly disagree about remarks made about teaching from the QCA etc. In my mind, it is wonderful that with so much to cover, the QCA and Strategies provide some ideas of how to formulate lessons. But I disagree that they are not creative! I took a thoroughly DRY science lesson from the QCA the other day, mapped it out and went through it with the class. We had a great time, the activity was fun and it all came concisely together. The children produced some great work and at the end they had an excellent understanding of what was being taught. I would also consider myself a naturally very creative person, but I like structure and coherence when there is so much to get through!
And why impress an overarching topic on to everything? The world isn't one overarching topic, it is made up of an infinite number of different subjects which should all be studied for what they are, not viewed through a lense of fabricated creativity.
This article points out that you can be creative by going out on school trips into your local enviroment, and by bringing in guest speakers. Haven't we been doing that anyway? Goes without saying.
I think if this creative curriculum fad continues for another ten years, we'll get to the end of the next decade, look back, and be told nope, it hasn't actually worked, standards have gone down not up, despite looking interesting on paper. Then we'll return to discrete subject based lessons once again and we can all stop reinventing the wheel for every new lesson taught.
Nobody is telling you that you can't take a dry lesson from the QCA and make it more interesting. I was teaching plant pollination the other day. It felt a bit dry so we had some children up to reinact parts of the actual plant, with some scrunched up paper as the pollen. -But take that basis for a lesson away, impose an overarching topic and plan it all again from scratch to hit the same objectives, and you surely have to ask yourself if all that extra work is worth it! Especially as you can't expect to go through life expecting everything to be fun and games.
I am enthused
I am enthused by the creative curriculum and find David Morley's article very interesting. What a shame that some feel that these 'one off' days do not impact on pupils.
May I ask what they remember of school? Surely ths is an opportunity to apply children's learning and make it wonderful and memorable. Good teachers and leaders will not allow a creative curriculum to detract from pupil learning. Rather they will use it to enhance learning and will map exactly what is being taught to ensure coverage of core subject areas.
Easy it is not! It takes a lot of planning and careful thought to ensure that what takes place is effective and meaningful. This could be used as a springboard for future learning. As a member of the SLT within my school and the lead for the implementation of a more creative curriculum, I welcome this change and cannot wait to claim back the creativity which has been systematically drained from our profession.
There is some great ideas to
There is some great ideas to work with here and I cant wait to get to work on this in school
What's the point?
Why do learning objectives need to be memorable? Can a child learn to mentally calculate whilst 'playing shops' without being able to read: 'I am learning to use T10 as a strategy'?
There is absolute point to one off days, if the purpose of those days is to engage and empower learners to be active in their learning. Not all children can plod through lessons, systematically covering 'objectives'. The national curriculum is designed to be taught in any order possible; indeed they challenge you in the blurb in the front of the NC2000 to do exactly that.
Our children need experiences and depending upon where you teach and the experiences our children have outside of school, depends on wether you need to give children additional experiences other than 'school based'. Some areas of our countries cities have children who are not played with, not talked to and do not experience 'fun'. I agree that school should be an engaging and purposeful place, but sometimes you need to capture the children, grab their attention, and then once you 'have them' you can build on those experiences. The real challenge is not wether the children see their learning as purposeful, but whether we can really sit back after a day of teaching and say that our teaching was purposeful.
Longer term, real life projects are the way forward, I agree, however we all need quick wins both in school and at home. Our learners need to learn that learning needs to be experienced, not taken.
Whats the point?
What is the point of one off days? Kids have a great time but objectives covered? The event and experince will be memorable but learning objectives not so. That is why they brought in the National curriculum as learning takes time and ideas build on each other as children work at their own rates. This is very fashionable and easy for teachers.. but is it really a long term and sustainable way to educate.
Should children need such fun days if learning each day was engaging and memorable and they felt keen and purposeful as they arrive each day to school. Working on longer term real life based projects with children involved in interested carefully guided by the teacher would have more value. If you leave children who have had a good early life and have aparent that listens to themselves that is what they invent for themselves..... so why not work with that?
This sounds fantastic! Very
This sounds fantastic! Very inspiring to me and for children!
Very inspiring, makes it
Very inspiring, makes it sound so achievable... makes me really want to get stuck in!
Post new comment