Is consent needed to take photographs ior videos of students in schools? Simon White looks at this sensitive and contentious issue
There have been many instances reported in the press where schools haven’t allowed parents to take photographs or videos of their children in the school Nativity play. Usually, the dreaded Data Protection Act 1998 (the “Act”) is blamed because it strictly controls when ‘personal data’ (such as images and other data that identifies a living individual) may be ‘processed’ (processing includes the recording, holding and disclosure of personal data). In this article Simon White looks at why the Act is not to blame.
Does the Act apply to photographs or videos in schools?
It rarely applies to taking photographs or videos in schools and, where it does, the Information Commissioner’s Office (the 'ICO'), which oversees enforcement of the Act, has advocated a common-sense application of it.
The Act notes, at Section 36, that ‘personal data processed by an individual only for the purposes of that individual’s personal, family or household affairs (including recreational purposes)’ are exempt from the Act. This would include photographs taken by family members of their children at school events.
Is there any guidance available on exactly when the Act does and does not apply?
There is. In its ‘Data Protection Good Practice Note’ on taking photographs in schools, the ICO has given some useful examples of scenarios where the Act will not apply:
There are, however, instances where the Act will apply and the school (or other organisation taking the photographs or film – such as the local newspaper) will need to comply with the Act. Examples are:
Should we be obtaining consent?
In circumstances where the Act does apply, the key obligation of schools or the relevant third party is to ensure that consent from parents (or guardians) and pupils is obtained for that photography or filming. In its Good Practice Note, the ICO advocates a common sense approach to obtaining this consent:
'…a common sense approach suggests that if the photographer asks for permission to take a photograph, this will usually be enough to ensure compliance… Photos taken for official school use may be covered by the Act and pupils and students should be advised why they are being taken…'
What about implied consent, where parents do not object to the photo or video?
If, after being notified by the school that a pupil will be photographed or filmed (stating the reason for the photographs or film), the pupil or parent does not notify the school that they object, you can assume implied consent. It follows of course then that if a pupil, parent or guardian does object, the school should not take photographs or films of the relevant pupil on that occasion.
More info
Simon White is a data protection and freedom of information law specialist at Browne Jacobson LLP
This e-bulletin issue was first published in May 2009
About the author: Simon White
Comments
photos during a hospital consultation
A friend videoed herself and 2 children during a medical treatment for hearing in a teaching hospital. This was taken for her final exam. She was unaware of the fact that permission needed to have been sought. She was given permission by one parent but not the other. She deleted all reference to the other child except one part where the back of the head was shown. It seems that she is still in trouble and she is being harassed by the tutors concerned. What would the law say and which bit do we need to read up on? Thanks!
School protest teacher vidoes
My child was recently involved with a school protest against the formation of an Academy (5/6/09). A number of pupils (approx. 150) had expressed the right to protest and conducting there protest approx. 300m away from the school building, but on school fields at school break time.
The head teacher & deputy head teacher threatened the children with exclusion if there did not return to school, which the majority did return. A number remained; the deputy head teacher then branded a video camera & preceded to video the children, which intimidated a number of pupils including my son. Some where suppressed and a number acted in a playful / rather daft excited way (children act differently when being filmed). The children that did not return when told got 4 days exclusion (my son one of them, albeit was not one that was disruptive - words of the head teacher).
My wife was asked to go to a reintegration meeting with the head & deputy after the 4 day exclusion. My wife questioned the reason for the harsh decision and what evidence was there against her son. The video was played to show the disruption of certain protestors, albeit my son was one that was not shown to be disruptive, but in attendance. The reason for the 4 day exclusion was - Persistent and disruptive behavior.
Is the video by a teacher (without parent consent or even pupil consent) legal?
accident in school
This is not regarding data protection act during events, this is in regards to accidents happening in schools and parents rights. My son broke his leg at school and the school refused to give us permission to take pictures of the accident site, even when we asked to take them after children had left the school grounds.
What are our rights as parents when our child is involved in a serious accident on school grounds?
Post new comment