• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Teaching Expertise

  • Home
  • Classroom Ideas
  • Technology
  • Teacher’s Life
  • Deals & Shopping
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Home
  • Classroom Ideas
  • Technology
  • Teacher’s Life
  • Deals & Shopping
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

The 1950s concept of ‘refrigerator mothers’ and autism

October 15, 2011 //  by Admin

Gareth D Morewood blogged here for two years, 2008-2010. Gareth’s first eBook, The Role of the SENCO: An Insider’s Guide, is now available from the Optimus Education shop.

This week I went to a well-attended, high-profile training course on autism. During the course I saw some fascinating old television footage of so-called ‘experts’ sharing their ideas and theories regarding autism. What caught my attention most was the term ‘refrigerator mothers’, which apparently was coined in 1950 to describe some mothers of autistic children.

The term originates from a theory that autism may be related to a ‘genuine lack of maternal warmth’, which was published in 1949 by Leo Kanner when he was starting to investigate causes of autistic behaviour.

It was Dr Bruno Bettelheim, a University of Chicago professor and child development specialist, who facilitated the widespread acceptance of this notion in the 1950s and 1960s. Many articles and books published in that era attributed autism to a maternal lack of affection.

I can understand how Kanner and Bettelheim came to the initial conclusions that autism was developmental in relation to the mother, bearing in mind Bowlby’s identification of Attachment Disorder, but I find it indefensible that these cases were paraded so publicly, especially when there were so few examples. The idea of ‘refrigerator mothers’ was widely spread with no real explanation or context, and subsequently turned these women into social outcasts.

I am curious to look further into this early misdiagnosis from Kanner and Bettelheim; specifically how it affected notions of who people with autism were and what they presented at that point in time.

Often errors help to frame modern thinking. However, can we truly accept Bettelheim’s work as a core part of developmental theories about autism?

Find out more about the controversy of Bettelheim’s theory.

Category: articles

Previous Post: « Overcoming common outsourcing concerns: BSF
Next Post: Providing difficult feedback to staff: What to say and how to say it »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • 38 Gym Games For High School Students
  • 25 Magical Music Activities For Your Students With Disabilities
  • 15 Shaving Cream Projects That Preschoolers Will Love
  • 42 Excellent ESL Games For Kids
  • 44 Incredible Ways To Teach Sign Language To Your Kids
  • 31 Thankful Activities For Teaching Preschoolers Gratitude